ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2023
[Functional results and complications in the long-term follow-up after 25-gauge vitrectomy of epiretinal membrane].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of luminance on visual acuity measurement in eyes with epiretinal membrane.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Visual Acuity Correlations of Preoperative OCT Morphological Parameters After Phacovitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic epiretinal membranes can lead, among other things, to visual impairment and metamorphopsia. The treatment of choice is a pars plana vitrectomy with removal of the membrane. The improvement of visual acuity and postoperative complications have already been described in several studies.
objectiveThe aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of at least 3 years. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn the period from 2011 to 2016, a total of 667 eyes underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, membranectomy and peeling of the ILM (Internal limiting membrane) because of epiretinal membrane by the same surgeon. This study included 51 eyes from 51 patients who had returned to our clinic after at least 3 years. For the follow-up, data were collected after 3 months and then annually, if available. The mean follow-up time was 57 months (37-104 months). In the postoperative follow-up visual acuity, intraocular pressure and complications were recorded.
resultsOf the 51 eyes included 34 had a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with phacoemulsification and artificial lens implantation, 8 eyes without phako and 9 eyes were already pseudophakic. The most common complication in the follow-up period was a persistent macular edema with 5.9% (3 eyes) and a recurrence of epiretinal membrane in 5.9% of cases. The best corrected logMar visual acuity was 0.4 (0.1-1.3; n = 51) preoperatively, at the last examination 0.23 (0-1.0; n = 51, p < 0.001). Three months postoperatively, the logMar visual acuity was 0.29 (n = 41), after 1 year 0.25 (n = 35), 2 years 0.23 (n = 29), after 3 years 0.26 (n = 29), after 4 years 0.27 (n = 27), after 5 years 0.24 (n = 17) and after 6 years 0.24 (n = 13).
conclusionThe 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy is a low complication procedure for the removal of epiretinal membranes. The clearest increase in visual acuity can be seen within the first 3 months postoperatively, but then stabilizes. In the long-term follow up a change in visual acuity can also be found after more than 3 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36239803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.