Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239685›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Shifts in bacterial communities in the rumen, vagina, and uterus of beef heifers receiving different levels of concentrate.

Autumn T Pickett, Reinaldo F Cooke, Shea J Mackey, Alice P Brandão, Eduardo A Colombo, Ramiro V Oliveira Filho, Gabriela Dalmaso de Melo, Ky G Pohler, Rebecca K Poole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects ofTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  4. Effects of feeding aTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Autumn T PickettDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Reinaldo F CookeDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-3601
Shea J MackeyDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Alice P BrandãoDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Eduardo A ColomboDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Ramiro V Oliveira FilhoDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Gabriela Dalmaso de MeloDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Ky G PohlerDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2429-0893
Rebecca K PooleDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This experiment investigated the effects of diet composition on rumen, vaginal, and uterine microbiota of beef heifers. Fifteen rumen-cannulated, pubertal Angus-influenced heifers were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design (28-d periods and 21-d washout intervals). Dietary treatments included diets based on (as-fed) 100% grass hay (HF), 60% grass hay + 40% corn-based concentrate (INT), or 25% grass hay + 75% corn-based concentrate (HG). Treatments were offered individually to heifers once daily at 2% body weight. Rumen, vaginal, and uterine samples were collected on days 0 and 28 of each period. Data were analyzed using orthogonal contrasts (linear and quadratic), using results from day 0 as independent covariates and heifer as the experimental unit. Ruminal pH on day 28 decreased linearly (P < 0.01) as concentrate inclusion increased. Uterine and vaginal pH on day 28 were not affected by treatments (P ≥ 0.35). Within the rumen samples, Bacteriodetes was the most abundant phylum and its relative abundance linearly decreased (P ≤ 0.01) with the inclusion of concentrate. Prevotella was the most abundant genus within the rumen but was not affected by treatments (P ≥ 0.44). Genera with relative abundance ≥1% (average across treatments) in the rumen that were impacted by treatments (P ≤ 0.01) included Bacteroides, Pedobacter, Dysgonomonas, Caloramator, and Ruminococcus. Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in the vagina and uterus, but it was unaffected by treatments (P ≥ 0.16). Prevotella was the most abundant genus in the vagina, and its relative abundance increased (P < 0.01) with the inclusion of concentrate. Other genera with relative abundance ≥1% that were significantly affected (P ≤ 0.05) by treatments were Clostridium, Pedobacter, Roseburia, Oscillospira, Faecalibacterium, Caloramator, Paludibacter, Rhodothermus, and Porphyromonas. In uterine samples, Prevotella was the most abundant genus but was unaffected by treatments (P ≥ 0.29). Genera with relative abundance ≥1% in the uterus that were significantly affected (P < 0.01) by treatments were Caloramator, Paludibacter, and Thalassospira. Collectively, inclusion of concentrate in the diet altered the bacterial composition within the rumen as well as shifting bacterial populations within the vagina and uterus. Research is warranted to further understand the impacts of these diet-induced microbiota changes on reproductive function and performance of beef heifers.

Indexed as

DigestionRumenAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaCattleDietFemaleFermentationZea maysbeef heiferconcentrateforagemicrobiotareproduction

Identifiers

PMID36239685
PMCPMC9733499
OpenAlexW4306248184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.