Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239467›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2023

Overcoming Limitations in Peer-Victimization Research That Impede Successful Intervention: Challenges and New Directions.

Herbert W Marsh, Johnmarshall Reeve, Jiesi Guo, Reinhard Pekrun, Roberto H Parada, Philip D Parker, Geetanjali Basarkod, Rhonda Craven, Hye-Ryen Jang, Theresa Dicke and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Peer victimization and peer sexual harassment across early adolescence: Branches from the same tree or free-standing constructs?Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Herbert W MarshInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0002-1078-9717
Johnmarshall ReeveInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0002-6827-293X
Jiesi GuoInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0003-2102-803X
Reinhard PekrunInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0003-4489-3827
Roberto H ParadaCentre for Educational Research, Western Sydney University.ORCID 0000-0002-2225-0145
Philip D ParkerInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0002-4604-8566
Geetanjali BasarkodInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0003-3708-2751
Rhonda CravenInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-6676
Hye-Ryen JangInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0003-4676-7322
Theresa DickeInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0001-8868-2242
Joseph CiarrochiInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0003-0417-8100
Baljinder K SahdraInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.ORCID 0000-0001-5064-7783
Emma K DevineThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney.ORCID 0000-0001-8110-6445
Sung Hyeon CheonCollege of Education, Korea University.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-3895
Australian Catholic University · AUKorea University · KRUniversity of Sydney · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer victimization at school is a worldwide problem with profound implications for victims, bullies, and whole-school communities. Yet the 50-year quest to solve the problem has produced mostly disappointing results. A critical examination of current research reveals both pivotal limitations and potential solutions. Solutions include introducing psychometrically sound measures to assess the parallel components of bullying and victimization, analyzing cross-national data sets, and embracing a social-ecological perspective emphasizing the motivation of bullies, importance of bystanders, pro-defending and antibullying attitudes, classroom climate, and a multilevel perspective. These solutions have been integrated into a series of recent interventions. Teachers can be professionally trained to create a highly supportive climate that allows student-bystanders to overcome their otherwise normative tendency to reinforce bullies. Once established, this intervention-enabled classroom climate impedes bully-victim episodes. The take-home message is to work with teachers on how to develop an interpersonally supportive classroom climate at the beginning of the school year to catalyze student-bystanders' volitional internalization of pro-defending and antibullying attitudes and social norms. Recommendations for future research include studying bullying and victimization simultaneously, testing multilevel models, targeting classroom climate and bystander roles as critical intervention outcomes, and integrating school-wide and individual student interventions only after improving social norms and the school climate.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsHumansPeer GroupSchoolsSocial Environmentantibullying attitudes and bystander effectsmultilevel interventionmultiple components of bullying and victimizationsocial-ecological and self-determination perspectives

Identifiers

PMID36239467
PMCPMC10336717
OpenAlexW4306247749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.