Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239317›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2022

Serum amyloid A as a marker to detect sepsis and predict outcome in hospitalized neonatal foals.

Emma Hoeberg, Alexandra Sånge, Claude Saegerman, Anna Bohlin, Katarina Nostell, Inge Durie, Louise Husted, Anna Öhman, Stine Jacobsen, Lise Berg and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Emma HoebergMedicine and Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-0459
Alexandra SångeMedicine and Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Claude SaegermanResearch Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULiege), Fundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-7436
Anna BohlinEvidensia Equine Specialist Hospital Helsingborg, Helsingborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2704-1254
Katarina NostellSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Inge DurieEvidensia Equine Specialist Hospital Stromsholm, Stromsholm, Sweden.
Louise HustedHøjgaard Equine Hospital, Morud, Denmark.
Anna ÖhmanEvidensia Equine Specialist Hospital Helsingborg, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Stine JacobsenMedicine and Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-4576
Lise BergMedicine and Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-2885
Sigrid Hyldahl LaursenMedicine and Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Gaby van GalenMedicine and Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0689-7141
University of Copenhagen · DKHelsingborgs lasarett · SELindholmen Science Park · SEMoesgaard Museum · DKSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum amyloid A (SAA) has been reported to hold promise as diagnostic and prognostic marker in foals. This has not been investigated thoroughly.

objectivesEvaluate admission SAA concentrations as predictor of sepsis and outcome. ANIMALS: Five hundred and ninety hospitalized foals <14 days old.

methodsRetrospective multicenter study. Foals were scored with sepsis and survival scores, grouped according to health category (septic, sick but nonseptic, uncertain sepsis status) and outcome; septic foals were further categorized according to severity (normal sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock). SAA was compared between groups using Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified optimal SAA cut off values for detecting sepsis and predicting outcome.

resultsAdmission SAA concentrations differed significantly between sick nonseptic foals (312.1 ± 685.4 mg/L) and septic foals (1079.7 ± 1254.5 mg/L) and increased with increasing sepsis score. SAA did not differ between sepsis severity groups. The optimal cut off for sepsis detection was 1050 mg/L (sensitivity 30.2%, specificity 90.7%). Admission SAA concentrations were lower in surviving (435.0 ± 723.6 mg/L) compared to nonsurviving foals (1062.7 ± 1440.1 mg/L) and decreased with increasing survival score. The optimal cut off for nonsurvival prediction was 1250 mg/L (sensitivity 22.1%, specificity 90.8%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: SAA concentration was higher in septic foals and nonsurviving foals. Even though optimal cut offs for SAA to detect sepsis and predict outcome had low sensitivity, they had good specificity. SAA can therefore be used as a marker to rule out sepsis and nonsurvival.

Indexed as

Horse DiseasesSepsisAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiomarkersHorsesSerum Amyloid A ProteinBiomarkersSerum Amyloid A Proteinbiomarkerequineprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36239317
PMCPMC9708439
OpenAlexW4306168570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.