Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238977›Full record

SynthesisHematological oncology2023

Predictors of clinical evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hematological patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elena Carrara, Elisa Razzaboni, Anna Maria Azzini, Maria Elena De Rui, Mariana Nunes Pinho Guedes, Anna Gorska, Maddalena Giannella, Linda Bussini, Michele Bartoletti, Federica Arbizzani and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hematological oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena CarraraDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisa RazzaboniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Anna Maria AzziniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria Elena De RuiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9421-0847
Mariana Nunes Pinho GuedesDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Anna GorskaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maddalena GiannellaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Linda BussiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Michele BartolettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federica ArbizzaniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Zaira R Palacios-BaenaDepartment of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, University of Seville, Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBiS) / CSIC; and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Seville, Spain.
Giulia CaponcelloDepartment of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, University of Seville, Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBiS) / CSIC; and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Seville, Spain.
Natalia MaldonadoDepartment of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, University of Seville, Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBiS) / CSIC; and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Seville, Spain.
Jesús Rodríguez-BañoDepartment of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, University of Seville, Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBiS) / CSIC; and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Seville, Spain.
Carlo ViscoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Mauro KramperaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Evelina TacconelliDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · IT

Funding

ORCHESTRA project under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 101016167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Main aim of this systematic review is to quantify the risk and identify predictors of clinical evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in hematological patients compared to different control populations. Two independent reviewers screened the literature assessing clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult patients with active hematological malignancies published up to June 2021. Primary outcome was COVID-19 related mortality, secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive-care admission, mechanical ventilation (MV), and thromboembolic events. Variables related to study setting, baseline patients' demographic, comorbidities, underlying hematological disease, ongoing chemotherapy, COVID-19 presentation, and treatments were extracted. A total of 67 studies including 10,061 hematological patients and 111,143 controls were included. Most of the studies were retrospective cohorts (51 studies, 76%) and only 19 (13%) provided data for a control group. A significant increased risk of clinical progression in the hematological population compared to the controls was found in terms of COVID-19 related mortality (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.77-2.54), hospitalization (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.15-3.43), intensive-care admission (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.38-2.26), and MV (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.71-2.75). The risk remained significantly higher in the subgroup analysis comparing hematological patients versus solid cancer. Meta-regression analysis of uncontrolled studies showed that older age, male sex, and hypertension were significantly related to worse clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in hematological population. Older age and hypertension were found to be associated also to thromboembolic events. In conclusion, hematological patients have a higher risk of COVID-19 clinical progression compared to both the general population and to patients with solid cancer.

Indexed as

COVID-19HypertensionNeoplasmsAdultDisease ProgressionHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19determinantshematological malignanciesmortalityseverity

Identifiers

PMID36238977
PMCPMC9874549
OpenAlexW4306160781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.