Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238955›Full record

ArticleJournal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities2019

After Disclosure: A Research Protocol to Respond to Disclosures of Abuse and Sexual Violence in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disabilities.

Nechama Sammet Moring, Susan L Parish, Monika Mitra, Nancy A Alterio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nechama Sammet MoringLurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Susan L ParishBouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9045-1750
Monika MitraLurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Nancy A AlterioCommonwealth of Massachusetts, Disabled Persons Protection Commission, Braintree, MA, USA.

Funding

Pregnancy experiences of women with IDD: Family caregiver perspectivesR01HD082105 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MITRA, MONIKA, PARISH, SUSAN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with intellectual disabilities (ID) have high lifetime risk of abuse and assault, including sexual violence. As adults with ID participate in research, researchers must be prepared for disclosures of past or current abuse. In collaboration with our state's protective agency, we developed a protocol for responding effectively to disclosures of sexual violence from adult research participants with ID. We completed a literature review clarifying best practices for responding to disclosures of abuse by adults with ID. The literature focused on various professionals but we were unable to find evidence clarifying researchers' roles in responding to sexual violence. Working with our state protective services agency, we adapted these practices to develop protocols and an algorithm for responding to disclosure, as well as materials for participants. Our protocol for abuse reporting considers all members of the research team to be mandated reporters, emphasizes informed consent, and details specific steps for responding to disclosures of abuse in the context of research. It represents a collaboration between academic researchers and community partners. Research participation by people with ID may represent an opportunity for disclosure of past or current abuse, and therefore, it is imperative that researchers are equipped to respond effectively. Policy-level responses to prevent abuse and enable justice are also needed; however, ensuring that researchers respond systematically and effectively to disclosures is crucial to the ethical conduct of research with a vulnerable population. We anticipate that the frequency with which researchers will need to use this protocol will depend on the nature of their research. In practice, we recommend including this protocol as part of the overall study protocol and submitting it for Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. Future research to test our protocol in the field is recommended.

Indexed as

abuse reportingintellectual disabilityresearch participationresearch responsesexual violence

Identifiers

PMID36238955
PMCPMC9555803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.