Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238865›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) approach for L5-S1: Preliminary experience.

Junjie Xu, Enliang Chen, Le Wang, Xiaobao Zou, Chenfu Deng, Junlin Chen, Rencai Ma, Xiangyang Ma, Zenghui Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.International journal of spine surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Junjie XuThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Enliang ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Le WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaobao ZouDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of Chinese PLA, Guangzhou, China.
Chenfu DengThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Junlin ChenThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Rencai MaThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangyang MaDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of Chinese PLA, Guangzhou, China.
Zenghui WuThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · CNFoshan Hospital of TCM · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Technical report. Objective: Evaluate technical feasibility of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) at the L5-S1 level and provide an elaborate description of the surgical technique. Summary of Background Data: With the development of surgical techniques, the indications for oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery have been broadened to the L5/S1 segment. However, this technique also has limitations. Different from OLIF, the L5/S1 segment used to be considered the main contraindication for XLIF. To date, no authors have reported the application of XLIF at the L5/S1 level. Methods: Only patients whose preoperative lumbar MRI showed the position of the psoas major muscles and blood vessels at the L5/S1 level were similar to those seen at supra-L5 levels were seleted. By folding the operating table, the iliac crest was moved downward to expose the L5/S1 intervertebral space during the operation. The remaining surgical procedures were consistent with routine XLIF surgery. Results: 8 patients successfully underwent XLIF at the L5/S1 level. The L5/S1 disk spaces were always exposed sufficiently for disk preparation and cage insertion. The post operative radiographs showed a satisfactory L5/S1 reconstruction with good cage position. Only 1 patient (12.5%) felt thigh numbness, and the symptoms gradually resolved after surgery and were no longer present in a month. There were no cases of psoas hematoma, retrograde ejaculation or vascular injury. The postoperative VAS score showed that all the patients achieved satisfactory results. Conclusions: XLIF at L5-S1 is feasible in strictly selected cases after thorough preoperative preparation and careful intraoperative procedures. However, we did not recommend XLIF as a routine surgical option at the L5/S1 level.

Indexed as

iliac crestiliac vesselsL5-S1lumbar plexussurgical techniqueXLIF

Identifiers

PMID36238865
PMCPMC9552697
OpenAlexW4297383960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.