Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238837›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2022

Comparative effectiveness of interventional therapeutic modalities for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Xin-Long Chen, Hai-Chuan Yu, Qi-Gang Fan, Qi Yuan, Wen-Kai Jiang, Shao-Zhen Rui, Wen-Ce Zhou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin-Long ChenDepartment of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Hai-Chuan YuFirst Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Qi-Gang FanFirst Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Qi YuanDepartment of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Wen-Kai JiangDepartment of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Shao-Zhen RuiDepartment of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Wen-Ce ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Lanzhou University · CNFirst Hospital of Lanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is unclear whether hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is more efficient in the combination therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Head-to-head comparisons among HAIC-related therapies are lacking. For this network meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to April 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if they evaluated the use or prolongation of TACE or HAIC in patients with advanced HCC and reported or collected survival data. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and make direct and indirect comparisons between treatments. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to explore the efficacy of various treatment options on overall survival (OS), odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI were used for overall response rate (ORR), whereas risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI were used for serious adverse events (SAEs). The analysis of 7 trials including a total of 1,073 patients found that sorafenib with HAIC-oxaliplatin improved survival (HR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.25-0.44); the ORR was also improved in patients treated with sorafenib plus HAIC-oxaliplatin and sorafenib plus PF-HAIC (OR=22.18, 95% CI: 10.69-52.56; and OR=2.72, 95% CI: 1.43-5.36, respectively). The incidence of liver injury was elevated in patients treated with sorafenib plus TACE (OR=5.93, 95% CI: 2.70-15.41). However, no differences in the incidences of other SAEs were identified among the treatment groups. The present meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence for the comparative safety and efficacy of HAIC and TACE combined with sorafenib, and indicates the dominance of HAIC-oxaliplatin in HCC interventional therapy. However, high-quality RCTs are required to further confirm the efficacy of HAIC-oxaliplatin. The present study has been registered with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42021288497).

Indexed as

combination therapyefficacyhepatic artery infusion chemotherapyhepatocellular carcinomatranscatheter arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID36238837
PMCPMC9494298
OpenAlexW4293763094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.