Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238756›Full record

ArticleDigital health

A qualitative study to explore the acceptability and usefulness of personalized biofeedback to motivate physical activity in cancer survivors.

Grace E Brannon, Madison Ray, Patrick Cho, Miranda Baum, Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Therese Bevers, Susan M Schembre, Karen Basen-Engquist, Yue Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparing sleep measures in cancer survivors: self-reported sleep diary versus objective wearable sleep tracker.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Grace E BrannonDepartment of Communication, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Madison RayDepartment of Communication, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Patrick ChoDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Miranda BaumDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Muhammad Shaalan BegDivision of Hematology/Medical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Therese BeversDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Susan M SchembreDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Karen Basen-EngquistDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yue LiaoDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-336X
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Many cancer survivors do not meet recommended levels of exercise, despite the benefits physical activity offers. This study aimed to understand experiences of insufficiently active overweight/obese breast or colorectal cancer survivors, in efforts to (1) examine regular physical activity barriers, and (2) determine perceptions and acceptability of a remotely delivered physical activity intervention utilizing wearable sensors and personalized feedback messages. Methods: In-person and virtual small group interviews were conducted engaging overweight/obese cancer survivors ( Results: All participants expressed needing to increase physical activity, identifying lack of motivation centering on survivorship experiences and symptom management as the most salient barrier. They indicated familiarity with activity trackers (i.e., Fitbit) and expressed interest in biosensors (i.e., continuous glucose monitors [CGMs]) as CGMs show biological metrics in real-time. Participants reported (1) personalized feedback messages can improve motivation and accountability; (2) CGM acceptability is high given survivors' medical history; and (3) glucose data is a relevant health indicator and they appreciated integrated messages (between Fitbit and CGM) in demonstrating how behaviors immediately affect one's body. Conclusions: This study supports the use of wearable biosensors and m-health interventions to promote physical activity in cancer survivors. Glucose-based biofeedback provides relevant and motivating information for cancer survivors regarding their daily activity levels by demonstrating the immediate effects of physical activity. Integrating biofeedback into physical activity interventions could be an effective behavioral change strategy to promote a healthy lifestyle in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

behavioral interventionsbiosensorscancer survivorsexercisemobile healthphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID36238756
PMCPMC9551329
OpenAlexW4306247887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.