Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238703›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2022

Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.

Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele, Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento, Ana Catarina Imbelloni-Vasconcelos, Luciano Augusto Cano Martins, Andrea Dos Anjos Pontual, Flávia Maria Moraes Ramos-Perez, Deborah Queiroz Freitas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rocharles Cavalcante FonteneleDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6426-9768
Eduarda Helena Leandro NascimentoDepartment of Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, Odontomed Imagem - Medical and Dental Services, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-2320
Ana Catarina Imbelloni-VasconcelosDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0609-2052
Luciano Augusto Cano MartinsDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5159-8645
Andrea Dos Anjos PontualDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3596-446X
Flávia Maria Moraes Ramos-PerezDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9948-0769
Deborah Queiroz FreitasDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1425-5966
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRCentrus Diagnósticos por Imagem · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of kilovoltage-peak (kVp) and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the detection of buccal and lingual peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) and zirconia (Zr) implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: Twenty implant sites were created in the posterior region of human mandibles, including control sites (without dehiscence) and experimental sites (with dehiscence). Individually, a Ti-Zr or Zr implant was placed in each implant site. CBCT scans were performed using a Picasso Trio device, with variation in the kVp setting (70 or 90 kVp) and whether the MAR tool was used. Three oral radiologists scored the detection of dehiscence using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared by multi-way analysis of variance (α=0.05). Results: The kVp, cortical plate involved (buccal or lingual cortices), and MAR did not influence any diagnostic values ( Conclusion: The detection of peri-implant dehiscence was not influenced by kVp, use of the MAR tool, or the cortical plate. Greater sensitivity and lower specificity were shown for the detection of peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of a Zr implant.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental ImplantsPeri-ImplantitisTitaniumZirconium

Identifiers

PMID36238703
PMCPMC9530290
OpenAlexW4285507398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.