ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Prevalence and Early Prediction of Diabetes Using Machine Learning in North Kashmir: A Case Study of District Bandipora.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Optimized and Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Diabetes Prediction Using Marine Predators Algorithm and SHAP.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence driven insights into smoking prediction using machine learning and clinical parameters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring using a dual band microwave sensor with machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using a robust model to detect the association between anthropometric factors and T2DM: machine learning approaches.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Advanced supervised machine learning methods for precise diabetes mellitus prediction using feature selection.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Improving diabetes disease patients classification using stacking ensemble method with PIMA and local healthcare data.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Automated blood glucose regulation for nonlinear model of type-1 diabetic patient under uncertainties: GWOCS type-2 fuzzy approach.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
- Stacking with Recursive Feature Elimination-Isolation Forest for classification of diabetes mellitus.PloS one · 2024Article
- Identifying diagnostic indicators for type 2 diabetes mellitus from physical examination using interpretable machine learning approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Diabetes risk prediction model based on community follow-up data using machine learning.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is one of the biggest health problems that affect millions of people across the world. Uncontrolled diabetes can increase the risk of heart attack, cancer, kidney damage, blindness, and other illnesses. Researchers are motivated to create a Machine Learning methodology that can predict diabetes in the future. Exploiting Machine Learning Algorithms (MLA) is essential if healthcare professionals are able to identify diseases more effectively. In order to improve the medical diagnosis of diabetes this research explored and contrasts various MLA that can identify diabetes risk early. The research includes the analysis on real datasets such as a clinical dataset gathered from a doctor in the Indian district of Bandipora in the years April 2021-Feb2022. MLA are currently important in the healthcare sector due to their prediction abilities. Researchers are using MLA to improve disease prediction and reduce cost. In this Paper author developed a methodology using Machine Learning Algorithms for Diabetes Disease Risk Prediction in North Kashmir. Six MLA have been successfully used in the experimental study such as Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boost (GB), Decision Tree (DT), and Logistic Regression (LR). RF is the most accurate classifier with the uppermost accuracy rate of 98 percent followed by MLP (90.99%), SVM (92%), GBC (97%), DT (96%), and LR (69%), respectively, with the balanced data set. Lastly, this study enables us to effectively identify the prevalence and prediction of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.