ArticleFrontiers in big data2022
The ABC recommendations for validation of supervised machine learning results in biomedical sciences.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nanomedicine: From Drug Formulation and Nanocarrier Design to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Hospital Malnutrition Screening: Validation of a Novel Machine Learning Model.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Signature literature review reveals AHCY, DPYSL3, and NME1 as the most recurrent prognostic genes for neuroblastoma.BioData mining · 2023Article
- The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification.BioData mining · 2023Article
- Ten quick tips for computational analysis of medical images.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Towards a potential pan-cancer prognostic signature for gene expression based on probesets and ensemble machine learning.BioData mining · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.