ReviewOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2022
Antioxidant Indexes and Immune Function of the Intestinal Flora of Compound Microecological Preparations.
Review in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of perioperative ONS combined with intestinal microecology in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Impact of dietary antioxidants on female infertility risk: evidence from NHANES.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Immune Remodeling during Aging and the Clinical Significance of Immunonutrition in Healthy Aging.Aging and disease · 2024Review
- The Impact of Early-Life Cecal Microbiota Transplantation on Social Stress and Injurious Behaviors in Egg-Laying Chickens.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Review of yeast culture concerning the interactions between gut microbiota and young ruminant animals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Retracted: Antioxidant Indexes and Immune Function of the Intestinal Flora of Compound Microecological Preparations.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2024Article
- Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and coronary heart disease among US adults: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Effects of Yupingfeng Polysaccharides as Feed Supplement on Immune Function and Intestinal Microbiome in Chickens.Microorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-01-09Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compound probiotics are biological products made by mixing and cultivating various probiotics according to appropriate composition and ratio. It can not only play the role of a variety of probiotics in composition but also the effect of the ratio is often greater than the effect of the single strain alone. These probiotics are good for the body's immune system in living organisms. They act as immune boosters in living organisms. They are considered the safest form of treatment. In this review, the effects of microecological agents on antioxidant indices and immune function of chicks were studied, and radial basis neural network (RBFNN) was described. Aiming at the deficiency of traditional RBFNN learning strategy, a three-layer RBFNN method based on immune mechanism was proposed. In this paper, the microecological evaluation preparation was added into chicken feed. The study showed that chickens fed with probiotics gained significant body weight at 6 weeks of age. Compared with the control group, the experimental group increased by 15.70%. In each feed/gain ratio, the feed/gain ratio of the experimental group was significantly decreased at 6 weeks of age, which was 30.37% lower than that of the control group. Compared with the control group, the spleen, bursa of Fabricius, and thymus of the experimental group were increased by 63.02%, 38.77%, and 26.82%, respectively, indicating that the compound probiotics could improve the immunity of chickens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.