Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238485›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Ontology-Based Relational Product Recommendation System.

Aisha Alsobhi, Ngiste Amare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aisha AlsobhiDepartment of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2214-1982
Ngiste AmareDepartment of Civil Engineering, Mizan-Tepi University, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3508-9175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As online shopping has expanded, product recommendations on e-commerce websites have gained significance. Systems for recommending products use information about site navigation and user leave-over to suggest more products. Customers who use a product recommendation system choose better and find items more quickly. On e-commerce websites, collaborative and content-based filtering is used in product suggestion algorithms. Collaborative filtering is driven by user preference similarity and content-based filtering. While content-based filtering groups are related to products, collaboration groups are like-minded individuals. In collaborative filtering, users with similar user profiles are used during the proposal phase; in content-based filtering, users with similar product profiles are found and recommended. These techniques cannot deliver complex commodities and have slow start-up times and small element sets. Users can push the same product if they only like certain things, but they cannot recommend a new product or user who just joined the system because they are not a group member. These approaches cannot capture complex semantic relationships, making them inadequate for recommending complex products. Recent research has focused on incorporating the domain ontology into the proposition process to create a more precise and helpful suggestion. The relational qualities of the product are not covered in this study, only its category and features are. Actually, the ontology of the proposed product should be included in the suggestion system. Relational data is integrated into the recommendation engine in this study using domain ontologies. This was done to research books that people had recommended. Relational data from an online bookseller was used to test the proposed infrastructure.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36238485
PMCPMC9553331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.