ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2022
Automatic sleep stages classification using multi-level fusion.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tethered Catalytic Hairpin Assembly with Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Readout for Single Molecule Detection.Small methods · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Amyloid Brain PET Quantification Method.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Quantifying the Suitability of Biosignals Acquired During Surgery for Multimodal Analysis.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Sub-Scalp Implantable Telemetric EEG (SITE) for the Management of Neurological and Behavioral Disorders beyond Epilepsy.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Influence of Channel Selection and Subject's Age on the Performance of the Single Channel EEG-Based Automatic Sleep Staging Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep efficiency is a factor that can determine a person's healthy life. Sleep efficiency can be calculated by analyzing the results of the sleep stage classification. There have been many studies to classify sleep stages automatically using multiple signals to improve the accuracy of the sleep stage classification. The fusion method is used to process multi-signal data. Fusion methods include data-level fusion, feature-level fusion, and decision-level fusion methods. We propose a multi-level fusion method to increase the accuracy of the sleep stage classification when using multi-signal data consisting of electroencephalography and electromyography signals. First, we used feature-level fusion to fuse the extracted features using a convolutional neural network for multi-signal data. Then, after obtaining each classified result using the fused feature data, the sleep stage was derived using a decision-level fusion method that fused classified results. We used public datasets, Sleep-EDF, to measure performance; we confirmed that the proposed multi-level fusion method yielded a higher accuracy of 87.2%, respectively, compared to single-level fusion method and more existing methods. The proposed multi-level fusion method showed the most improved performance in classifying N1 stage, where existing methods had the lowest performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.