Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238352›Full record

ArticleUrology practice2021

Assessing Quality and Safety of an Advanced Practice Provider-led Active Surveillance Clinic for Men with Prostate Cancer.

Matthew B Clements, Xin Lin, Caroline Gmelich, Emily A Vertosick, Andrew J Vickers, Michael K Manasia, Natalie C Wolchasty, Peter T Scardino, James A Eastham, Vincent P Laudone and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthew B ClementsUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Xin LinAdvanced Practice Providers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Caroline GmelichUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Emily A VertosickDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Andrew J VickersDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Michael K ManasiaUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Natalie C WolchastyAdvanced Practice Providers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter T ScardinoUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
James A EasthamUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vincent P LaudoneUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Karim A TouijerUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Behfar EhdaieUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We implemented an advanced practice provider (APP)-led clinic to aid in managing the growing population of men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. Our objective was to evaluate the quality and safety of an established APP-led AS clinic by comparing outcomes with urologist-led biopsies, defined in terms of adherence to scheduled visits and biopsy complications. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 2341 consecutive patients treated in an AS clinic at a high-volume referral center between 2000-2019. We examined the rate of no-show or same-day cancellation of visits for APPs versus urologists and compared the risk of biopsy complications between these providers. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for repeated visits and biopsies. Results: There were significantly more no-shows at APP visits (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.70, Conclusions: We demonstrated that in an established APP-led AS clinic at a high-volume center, APPs achieved acceptable patient adherence to scheduled visits and biopsy complications. Because patients were not continuously managed by one type of provider, further prospective studies are needed to establish equivalent pathologic outcomes in APP-managed AS.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceAdvanced Practice ProvidersNurse practitionerPhysician assistantProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36238352
PMCPMC9555125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.