Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238288›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022

MicroRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for Tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta- analysis.

Evangeline Ann Daniel, Balakumaran Sathiyamani, Kannan Thiruvengadam, Sandhya Vivekanandan, Hemanathan Vembuli, Luke Elizabeth Hanna

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Epigenetic Mechanisms Induced byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Significance of extracellular vesicles in orchestration of immune responses inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evangeline Ann DanielDepartment of Virology and Biotechnology, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Balakumaran SathiyamaniDepartment of Virology and Biotechnology, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Kannan ThiruvengadamDepartment of Statistics, Epidemiology Unit, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Sandhya VivekanandanDepartment of Virology and Biotechnology, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Hemanathan VembuliDepartment of Virology and Biotechnology, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Luke Elizabeth HannaDepartment of Virology and Biotechnology, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The early diagnosis of tuberculosis using novel non-sputum-based biomarkers is of high priority in the End TB strategy. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are significant regulators of TB pathogenesis and their differential expression pattern among healthy, latent, and active TB population has revealed their potentiality as biomarkers in recent studies. Thus, we systematically reviewed and performed a meta-analysis on the role of host miRNAs in TB diagnosis. We also reviewed the involvement of miRNAs in the immune response to Methods: Pubmed, Ovid and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve published literature from 2000 to 2020 using predefined keywords. We screened relevant studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and the included studies were assessed for their quality using STARD guidelines and QUADAS-2 tool. Funnel plots were constructed to assess the publication bias. The heterogeneity of studies and overall pooled results of sensitivity, specificity and DOR were determined using forest plots. Results: We retrieved a total of 447 studies collectively from all the databases, out of which 21 studies were included for qualitative analysis. In these studies, miR-29, miR-31, miR-125b, miR146a and miR-155 were consistently reported. The overall sensitivity, specificity and DOR of these miRNAs were found to be 87.9% (81.7-92.2), 81.2% (74.5-86.5) and 43.1(20.3-91.3) respectively. Among these, miR-31 had the maximum diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity of 96% (89.7-98.5), specificity of 89% (81.2-93.8) and DOR of 345.9 (90.2-1326.3), meeting the minimal target product profile (TPP) for TB diagnostics. Conclusion: miRNAs can thus be exploited as potential biomarkers for rapid detection of tuberculosis as evident from their diagnostic performance. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021226559 PROSPERO (CRD42021226559).

Indexed as

MicroRNAsMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersMicroRNAsbiomarkerdiagnosisimmune modulationmiRNAmycobacterium tuberculosistuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36238288
PMCPMC9551313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.