Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238271›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors among infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment.

Xinyan Wang, Huiyan Wang, Aijun Du, Junchao Wang, Jie Shi, Yunshan Zhang, Yinfeng Zhang, Junfang Ma, Wenjia Meng, Jiabei Lv and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the outcome ofFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xinyan WangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Huiyan WangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Aijun DuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Junchao WangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Jie ShiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Yunshan ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Yinfeng ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Junfang MaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Wenjia MengCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Jiabei LvCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Haining LuoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Nankai University · CNTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although periconception vaccination is important to maternal and neonatal health, little is known about the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among infertile couples seeking fertility treatment. Thus, we conducted this survey among infertile patients in a reproductive medicine center, between September 2021 and December 2021, to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its influencing factors. Information was collected through face-to-face interviews among volunteers. Among the 987 included interviewees, 17.33% reported hesitancy in primary vaccination, 25.63% reported hesitancy in booster vaccination, and 32.32% delayed the primary vaccination. Hesitancy in primary vaccination was associated with unexplained infertility (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.05-2.98), ongoing IVF treatment (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.22-3.89), concerns for vaccine safety (OR: 4.13, 95% CI: 2.66-6.42), effectiveness (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15-2.28), and influence on pregnancy (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.68-4.67). These factors were also associated with hesitancy in booster vaccination. Delay of the primary vaccination was inversely associated with a college or above degree (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27-0.87), previous history of influenza vaccination (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.98), and was positively associated with concerns for the influence on pregnancy (OR: 7.78, 95% CI: 5.01-12.07). It is necessary to carry out targeted education program by health professionals to publicize the benefits of periconception vaccination, and to reduce the resistance to COVID-19 vaccine among infertile couples.

Indexed as

COVID-19InfertilityCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyReproductive Techniques, AssistedVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccinesassisted reproductive technologybooster vaccinationChinaCOVID-19infertilityprimary vaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36238271
PMCPMC9552881
OpenAlexW4297370256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.