Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36238200›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2022

Exploring radiation therapist education and training.

Mary Coffey, Amara Naseer, Michelle Leech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards proton therapy guidelines for radiation therapists and dosimetrists: A scoping review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Review
  6. Radiography students wishing to work in the field of radiation therapy: A French experience.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Behind the Scenes: Radiotherapy technical training through professionals' eyes.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary CoffeyDiscipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Amara NaseerDiscipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Michelle LeechDiscipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy has become increasingly complex over time and is rapidly evolving. Radiation therapists play a key role within the interdisciplinary team and their education must prepare them to function effectively in the future in order to ensure a safe, high quality radiation therapy service. The aim of this research was to evaluate the current status of radiation therapist education to establish the duration of education programs, the percentage of radiation therapy-specific content and the professional title on graduation. A survey was developed, based on the questionnaire used for the ESTRO 3rd Revision of the Core Curriculum for Radiation Therapists. This was piloted by colleagues to verify the validity of the survey and also its use outside of the European context. The final survey was distributed purposively through Survey Monkey via a local gatekeeper to key radiation therapy personnel covering all of Europe and Australia, New Zealand, USA and South Korea in January 2021 who distributed it to educational institutes and clinical departments in their respective countries. 101 responses were received of which 58 were fully complete and available for analysis representing 30 countries, 26 European and 4 beyond Europe. The duration and radiation therapy-specific content of education programs varied considerably with dedicated radiation therapy programs from the respondents offered only in Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and the U.S.A. 17 countries in the survey offer 'combined' programs with the majority dedicating less than 20% of their content to radiation therapy. Of note is that several respondents were unable to state the percentage of content related to radiation therapy and there was a variation in content and duration of programs, even within a single country. This survey has demonstrated that there remains a significant deficit in the educational programs of radiation therapists in many regions.

Indexed as

EducationRadiation TherapistTraining

Identifiers

PMID36238200
PMCPMC9552092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.