Alternative pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Conduction system pacing as a rescue strategy for unsuccessful cardiac resynchronisation therapy implantation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026
   Article
2. Device therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2024
   Review
3. Effectiveness of bundle of His pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure combined with wide QRS complex: a meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2024
   Review
4. The long-term safety and effectiveness of the loop technique in left ventricular lead dislocation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as