ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Cardiac MRI assessment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond ejection fraction: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in anthracycline cardiotoxicity.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Risk Stratification and Surveillance in Cardio-Oncology: Mechanistic Foundations and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Recovery from severe adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy after prolonged intensive care in a patient with uterine leiomyosarcoma: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnostics in cardio-oncology: a focus on anthracyclines.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Clinical Value of Cardiac Troponin I in Assessing Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Postoperative Breast Cancer Patients.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity and the Emerging Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors: From Glycemic Control to Cardio-Oncology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Long-term impact of anthracycline in early-stage breast cancer, bridging of MiRNAs profiler for early cardiotoxicity.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and perioperative cardiotoxicity.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2024Review
- Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Evolving field of cardio-oncology.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023Review
- Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this review article is to discuss how cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging measures left ventricular (LV) function, characterizes tissue, and identifies myocardial fibrosis in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy (Anth-bC). Specifically, CMR can measure LV ejection fraction (EF), volumes at end-diastole (LVEDV), and end-systole (LVESV), LV strain, and LV mass. Tissue characterization is accomplished through T1/T2-mapping, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and CMR perfusion imaging. Despite CMR's accuracy and efficiency in collecting data about the myocardium, there are challenges that persist while monitoring a cardio-oncology patient undergoing Anth-bC, such as the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors and utility controversies. Furthermore, CMR can be a useful adjunct during cardiopulmonary exercise testing to pinpoint cardiovascular mediated exercise limitations, as well as to assess myocardial microcirculatory damage in patients undergoing Anth-bC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.