ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2022
The relationship between myocardial bridge and frontal QRS-T angle.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new electrocardiographic evaluation in hyperkalemia: frontal QRS-T angle.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Article
- The relationship between myocardial bridge and frontal QRS-T angle.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Although Myocardial bridge (MB) is known as a benign condition, it has been demonstrated to be associated with cardiac arrhythmias and poor outcomes. Frontal QRS-T angle (fQRSTa) is a novel indicator of repolarization and depolarization heterogeneity. Last studies indicated that associated with fQRSTa and adverse cardiac events. No study evaluated the relationship between fQRSTa and MB. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between MB and fQRSTa. Methods: This study included 91 patients with normal coronary arteries and 89 patients with MB. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients due to ischemia findings on treadmill exercise test or myocardial scintigraphy.2-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) of all patients were evaluated. QT interval, fQRSTa, QTc interval were measured from surface ECGs. Results: Baseline clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory parameters were similar between MB and control group. However, when compared to control group, patients with MB had importantly raised fQRSTa [27 (20-41) vs. 23 (12-37) p = 0.007]. In correlation analysis, fQRSTa was positively correlated with MB length (r = 0.411, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that MB length was the just considerable predictor of fQRSTa (β = 0.247, p = 0.041). Conclusions: The fQRSTa is a novel electrocardiographic marker that can be easily obtained from surface ECG. We have shown for the first time that MB length is a significant predictor of fQRSTa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.