Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237837›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

"It's a decision I have to make": Patient perspectives on smoking and cessation after lung cancer screening decisions.

Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Anne C Melzer, Sarah S Ono, Santanu Datta, James M Davis, Christopher G Slatore

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04574518 (Teachable Moment to Opt-out of Tobacco), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04574518 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Teachable Moment to Opt-out of Tobacco (TeaM OUT): A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2022 to 2026Enrolled223ConditionsSolitary Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules, Tobacco UseArmsTeaM OUT Intervention, Enhanced Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara E GoldenCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Liana SchweigerCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Anne C MelzerCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sarah S OnoCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Santanu DattaHealth Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
James M DavisDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher G SlatoreCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies exist showing that involvement in lung cancer screening (LCS) leads to a change in rates of cigarette smoking. We investigated LCS longitudinally to determine whether teachable moments for smoking cessation occur downstream from the initial provider-patient LCS shared decision-making discussion and self-reported effects on smoking behaviors. We performed up to two successive semi-structured interviews to assess the experiences of 39 individuals who formerly or currently smoked cigarettes who underwent LCS decision-making discussions performed during routine care from three established US medical center LCS programs. The majority of those who remembered hearing about the importance of smoking cessation after LCS-related encounters did not report communication about smoking influencing their motivation to quit or abstain from smoking, including patients who were found to have pulmonary nodules. Patients experienced little distress related to LCS discussions. Patients reported that there were other, more significant, reasons for quitting or abstinence. They recommended clinicians continue to ask about smoking at every clinical encounter, provide information comparing the benefits of LCS with those of quitting smoking, and have clinicians help them identify triggers or other motivators for improving smoking behaviors. Our findings suggest that there may be other teachable moment opportunities outside of LCS processes that could be utilized to motivate smoking reduction or cessation, or LCS processes could be improved to integrate cessation resources.

Identifiers

PMID36237837
PMCPMC9551209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.