Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237755›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Continuous Spinal Anesthesia Technique After Accidental Dural Puncture.

Soumya Matturu, Amol Singam, Sheetal Madavi, Neeta Verma

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soumya MatturuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Wardha, IND.
Amol SingamDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Wardha, IND.
Sheetal MadaviDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Wardha, IND.
Neeta VermaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Wardha, IND.
Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences · INJawaharlal Nehru Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) is a mode of anesthesia and analgesia that has various therapeutic advantages. CSA allows the anesthesiologist to titrate tiny doses of a local anesthetic to achieve the desired degree of spinal anesthesia. The duration can be extended to accommodate the demands of the protracted operation. Due to a lack of equipment and financial restraints, particularly in resource-constrained areas, and worries of neurologic consequences such as cauda equina syndrome, CSA is yet to acquire general acceptability among anesthesiologists. In terms of postoperative pain management, CSA can be comparable to epidural analgesia and is considered far superior to abdominal wall blocks when correctly applied. Here we discuss a case wherein a standard epidural catheter in subarachnoid space was used to successfully perform an emergency exploratory laparotomy.

Indexed as

cauda equina syndromedural puncturepost dural puncture headachesensory blockspinal analgesia

Identifiers

PMID36237755
PMCPMC9553070
OpenAlexW4295159925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.