Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Are preoperative phase-contrast CSF flow parameters ideal for predicting the outcome of shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?

Wen-Jie He, Xie-Jun Zhang, Qi-Zhong Xu, Run-Tao Bai, Jia-Kuan Chen, Xi Zhou, Jun Xia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen-Jie HeDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xie-Jun ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Qi-Zhong XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Run-Tao BaiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jia-Kuan ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xi ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jun XiaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Phase-contrast magnetic resonance (PC-MR) is widely used in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), but its role in predicting prognosis remains controversial. To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative PC-MR CSF flow measurement in predicting the clinical response to shunt surgery in patients with iNPH. Methods: Forty-six patients with definite iNPH were included between January 2018 and January 2022. PC-MR was used to evaluate CSF peak velocity (PV), average velocity, aqueductal stroke volume (ASV), net ASV, and net flow. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), iNPH grading scale (iNPHGS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Timed 3-m Up and Go Test (TUG) were used for clinical assessment. The primary endpoint was the improvement in the mRS score 1 year after surgery, and the secondary endpoints were the iNPHGS, MMSE, and TUG scores at 1 year. Differences between shunt improvement and non-improvement groups, based on the clinical outcomes, were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test, logistic regression models, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Correlations between CSF flow parameters and the baseline clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: No CSF parameters significantly differed between shunt improvement and non-improvement groups based on mRS and secondary outcomes. And all CSF parameters showed significant overlap in both shunt improvement and non-improvement groups based on mRS and secondary outcomes. Significant correlations between the mRS and iNPHGS scores, and PV, ASV, and net ASV were observed. Conclusion: While some preoperative PC-MR CSF flow parameters reflected the symptom severity of iNPH to a certain extent, they alone might not be ideal markers of shunt responsiveness.

Indexed as

idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusmagnetic resonance imagingphase-contrast MRprognosisventriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID36237632
PMCPMC9552837
OpenAlexW4297370900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.