ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2022
Dynamic networks of P300-related process.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical Generators and Connections Underlying Phoneme Perception: A Mismatch Negativity and P300 Investigation.Brain topography · 2024Article
- Stimulation enhancement effect of the combination of exoskeleton-assisted hand rehabilitation and fingertip haptic stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Discovering the neuronal dynamics in major depressive disorder using Hidden Markov Model.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
P300 as an effective biomarker to index attention and memory has been widely used for brain-computer interface, cognitive evaluation, and clinical diagnosis. To evoke clear P300, an oddball paradigm consisting of two types of stimuli, i.e., infrequent target stimuli and frequent standard stimuli, is usually used. However, to simply and quickly explore the P300-related process, previous studies predominately focused on the target condition but ignored the fusion of target and standard conditions, as well as the difference of brain networks between them. Therefore, in this study, we used the hidden Markov model to investigate the fused multi-conditional electroencephalogram dataset of P300, aiming to effectively identify the underlying brain networks and explore the difference between conditions. Specifically, the inferred networks, including their transition sequences and spatial distributions, were scrutinized first. Then, we found that the difference between target and standard conditions was mainly concentrated in two phases. One was the stimulation phase that mainly related to the cortical activities of the postcentral gyrus and superior parietal lobule, and the other corresponded to the response phase that involved the activities of superior and medial frontal gyri. This might be attributed to distinct cognitive functions, as the stimulation phase is associated with visual information integration whereas the response phase involves stimulus discrimination and behavior control. Taken together, the current work explored dynamic networks underlying the P300-related process and provided a complementary understanding of distinct P300 conditions, which may contribute to the design of P300-related brain-machine systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.