Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237310›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Effect of lymph node resection on prognosis of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Feiyu Li, Yong Jiang, Liyong Jiang, Qingbin Li, Xiangyu Yan, Songhan Huang, Ji Chen, Shuai Yuan, Yingda Fu, Jun Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Radiological Loco-Regional Treatments for Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Feiyu LiShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yong JiangShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Liyong JiangShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Qingbin LiShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Xiangyu YanShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Songhan HuangShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Ji ChenShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Shuai YuanShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Yingda FuShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jun LiuShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of lymph node dissection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: The literature from January 2009 to December 2021 was searched to determine the comparative study of lymph node dissection and non-lymph node dissection in patients with ICC. Results: Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.80, p = 0.10; OR = 0.93, p = 0.71; OR = 0.80, p = 0.21) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.89, p = 0.73; OR = 0.92, p = 0.81; OR = 0.85, p = 0.62). Conclusions: Lymph node dissection does not seem to have a positive effect on the overall survival and disease-free survival.

Indexed as

disease-free survivalintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomalymph nodeoverall survivalprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36237310
PMCPMC9552707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.