Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237308›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer: A retrospective analysis of surgical and chemotherapeutic management in two high volume oncological centers.

Paolo Di Lorenzo, Vincenza Conteduca, Emanuela Scarpi, Marco Adorni, Francesco Multinu, Annalisa Garbi, Ilaria Betella, Tommaso Grassi, Tommaso Bianchi, Giampaolo Di Martino and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Case report:Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo Di LorenzoObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Vincenza ConteducaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Emanuela ScarpiBiostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Marco AdorniClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Francesco MultinuDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Annalisa GarbiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Ilaria BetellaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Tommaso GrassiClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Tommaso BianchiClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Giampaolo Di MartinoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Andrea AmadoriObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Paolo ManiglioObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Isabella StradaObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Silvestro CarinelliDepartment of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Marta JaconiDepartment of Pathology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Giovanni AlettiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Vanna ZanagnoloDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Angelo MaggioniDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Luca SavelliObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Ugo De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Fabio LandoniClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Nicoletta ColomboDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy.
Robert FruscioClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITOspedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple summary: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) represents an uncommon histotype of serous ovarian cancer (accounting for approximately 5% of all ovarian cancer) with a distinct behavior compared to its high-grade serous counterpart, characterized by a better prognosis and low response rate to chemotherapeutic agents. Similar to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery is considered crucial for patient survival. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcomes of women affected by advanced stages (III-IV FIGO) of LGSOC from two high-volume oncological centers for ovarian neoplasm. In particular, we sought to evaluate the impact on survival outcomes of optimal cytoreductive surgery [i.e., residual disease (RD) <10 mm at the end of surgery]. The results of our work confirm the role of complete cytoreduction (i.e., no evidence of disease after surgery) in the survival of patients and even the positive prognostic role of a minimal RD (i.e., <10 mm), whenever complete cytoreduction cannot be achieved. Background: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare entity with different behavior compared to high-grade serous (HGSOC). Because of its general low chemosensitivity, complete cytoreductive surgery with no residual disease is crucial in advanced stage LGSOC. We evaluated the impact of optimal cytoreduction on survival outcome both at first diagnosis and at recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced LGSOCs who underwent cytoreductive surgery in two oncological centers from January 1994 to December 2018. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using the Greenwood formula. Results: A total of 92 patients were included (median age was 47 years, IQR 35-64). The median overall survival (OS) was 142.3 months in patients with no residual disease (RD), 86.4 months for RD 1-10 mm and 35.2 months for RD >10 mm (p = 0.002). Progression-free survival (PFS) was inversely related to RD after primary cytoreductive surgery (RD = 0 vs RD = 1-10 mm vs RD >10 mm, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, RD 1-10 mm (HR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.30-4.06, p = 0.004), RD >10 mm (HR = 3.89, 95% CI 1.92-7.88, p = 0.0004), FIGO stage IV (p = 0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.010) were independent predictors of PFS. RD >10 mm (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.52-6.46, p = 0.004), FIGO stage IV (p <0.0001) and NACT (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with a lower OS. Conclusions: Optimal cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes in advanced stage LGSOC

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmentlow-grade serous ovarian cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyprimary cytoreductionresidual diseasesecondary cytoreductive surgery

Identifiers

PMID36237308
PMCPMC9551309
OpenAlexW4297311803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.