Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237276›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2022

A Machine Learning Model of Chemical Shifts for Chemically and Structurally Diverse Molecular Solids.

Manuel Cordova, Edgar A Engel, Artur Stefaniuk, Federico Paruzzo, Albert Hofstetter, Michele Ceriotti, Lyndon Emsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Efficient Machine Learning Prediction of Solvent-DependentJournal of computational chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Rapid Assignment of Chemical Shifts From Crystal Structures in Solid-State NMR.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  7. Machine-Learning Ice Spectra: From 1 to 256 Features.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  8. PredictingACS omega · 2026
    Article
  9. RSC advances · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Machine learning ofScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manuel CordovaLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-6541
Edgar A EngelTheory of Condensed Matter Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, U.K.
Artur StefaniukLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.
Federico ParuzzoLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.
Albert HofstetterLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.
Michele CeriottiNational Centre for Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials MARVEL, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-2832
Lyndon EmsleyLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-2572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts are a direct probe of local atomic environments and can be used to determine the structure of solid materials. However, the substantial computational cost required to predict accurate chemical shifts is a key bottleneck for NMR crystallography. We recently introduced ShiftML, a machine-learning model of chemical shifts in molecular solids, trained on minimum-energy geometries of materials composed of C, H, N, O, and S that provides rapid chemical shift predictions with density functional theory (DFT) accuracy. Here, we extend the capabilities of ShiftML to predict chemical shifts for both finite temperature structures and more chemically diverse compounds, while retaining the same speed and accuracy. For a benchmark set of 13 molecular solids, we find a root-mean-squared error of 0.47 ppm with respect to experiment for

Identifiers

PMID36237276
PMCPMC9549463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.