ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
A nomogram and risk classification model predicts prognosis in Chinese esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and characterization of survival-dependent genes in esophageal cancer via the DepMap database: unraveling their association with immune infiltration.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Advancements and challenges in esophageal carcinoma prognostic models: A comprehensive review and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Development of a nomogram for overall survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: A prospective cohort study in China.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- A new prognostic model of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on Cloud-least squares support vector machine.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A nomogram model based on gene mutations for predicting the prognosis of patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been established. We sought to develop a risk classification system. Methods: In total, 312 patients with complete clinical and genome mutation landscapes in our previous study were chosen for the present study. Public International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data of ESCC were also used as an external validation set. Results: Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method, we successfully built a 9-gene mutation-based prediction model for overall survival (OS) and a 21-gene mutation model for progression-free survival (PFS). High- and low-risk groups were stratified using the gene mutation-based classifier. Patients in the high-risk group witnessed poorer 3- and 5-year OS and PFS in both the training and validation sets (P<0.01). Moreover, calibration curves and decision curve analyses (DCAs) were used to confirm the independence and potential translational value of this predictive model. In the nomogram analysis, the risk classification model was shown to be a reliable prognostic tool. All results showed better consistency in the external ICGC and TCGA validation sets. Conclusions: We developed and validated a predictive risk model for ESCC. This practical prognostic model may help doctors make different follow-up decisions in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.