Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237183›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Diagnostic model for predicting hyperuricemia based on alterations of the gut microbiome in individuals with different serum uric acid levels.

Meiting Liang, Jingkun Liu, Wujin Chen, Yi He, Mayina Kahaer, Rui Li, Tingting Tian, Yezhou Liu, Bing Bai, Yuena Cui and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bibliometric analysis of intestinal microbiota and lung diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meiting LiangDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Jingkun LiuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of XinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Wujin ChenDepartment of Morphological Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yi HeDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Mayina KahaerDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Rui LiDepartment of Human Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Tingting TianDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yezhou LiuDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Bing BaiDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yuena CuiDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Shanshan YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital, Urumqi, China.
Wenjuan XiongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital, Urumqi, China.
Yan MaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Second People's Hospital, Urumqi, China.
Bei ZhangDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yuping SunDepartent of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Xinjiang Medical University · CNFifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the differences in the gut microbiome among participants with different uric acid levels (hyperuricemia [HUA] patients, low serum uric acid [LSU] patients, and controls with normal levels) and to develop a model to predict HUA based on microbial biomarkers. Methods: We sequenced the V3-V4 variable region of the 16S rDNA gene in 168 fecal samples from HUA patients (n=50), LSU patients (n=61), and controls (n=57). We then analyzed the differences in the gut microbiome between these groups. To identify gut microbial biomarkers, the 107 HUA patients and controls were randomly divided (2:1) into development and validation groups and 10-fold cross-validation of a random forest model was performed. We then established three diagnostic models: a clinical model, microbial biomarker model, and combined model. Results: The gut microbial α diversity, in terms of the Shannon and Simpson indices, was decreased in LSU and HUA patients compared to controls, but only the decreases in the HUA group were significant (P=0.0029 and P=0.013, respectively). The phylum Conclusions: The combined model is a reliable tool for predicting HUA and could be used to assist in the clinical evaluation of patients and prevention of HUA.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHyperuricemiaBiomarkersDNA, RibosomalHumansUric AcidBiomarkersDNA, RibosomalUric Aciddiagnostic modelgut microbiomehyperuricemianomogramuric acid

Identifiers

PMID36237183
PMCPMC9553226
OpenAlexW4297311969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.