Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36237145›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative care2025

Do Socioeconomic Factors Influence Knowledge, Attitudes, and Representations of End-of-Life Practices? A Cross-Sectional Study.

A Bérubé, D Tapp, S Dupéré, A Plaisance, G Bravo, J Downar, V Couture

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A BérubéFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local A-3645-D, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6693-3482
D TappFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local A-3645-D, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
S DupéréFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local A-3645-D, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
A PlaisanceFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local A-3645-D, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
G BravoFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
J DownarDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
V CoutureFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local A-3645-D, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveAccess to palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care might be influenced by knowledge, attitudes, and representations of these practices. Socioeconomic factors might then affect what people know about EOL care practices, and how they perceive them. This study aims to compare knowledge, attitudes, and representations regarding EOL practices including assisted suicide, medical assistance in dying, and continuous palliative sedation of adults, according to socioeconomic variables.MethodsA cross-sectional community-based questionnaire study featuring two evolving vignettes and five end-of-life practices was conducted in Quebec, Canada. Three sample subgroups were created according to the participants' perceived financial situation and three according to educational attainment. Descriptive analysis was used to compare levels of knowledge, attitudes, and representations between the subgroups.ResultsNine hundred sixty-six (966) people completed the questionnaire. Two hundred and seventy participants (28.7%) had a high school diploma or less, and 42 participants (4.4%) were facing financial hardship. The majority of respondents supported all end-of-life options and the loosening of eligibility requirements for medical assistance in dying. Differences between subgroups were minor. While respondents in socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroups had less knowledge about EOL practices, those with lower educational attainment were more likely to be in favor of medical assistance in dying, and less likely to favor continuous palliative sedation.ConclusionsPeople living with situational social and economic vulnerabilities face multiple barriers in accessing health care. While they may have poorer knowledge about EOL practices, they have a positive attitude towards medical assistance in dying and assisted suicide, and a negative attitude towards continuous palliative sedation. This highlights the need for future research and interventions aimed at empowering this population and enhancing their access to EOL care.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePalliative CareTerminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuebecSocioeconomic FactorsSuicide, AssistedSurveys and Questionnairesdeath literacyend-of-life careequityliteracymedical assistance in dyingpalliative caresocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID36237145
PMCPMC11967092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.