Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236785›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Performance of a Stratified Thermal Energy Storage Tank at a District Cooling Plant Using Sensor Data.

Afzal Ahmed Soomro, Ainul Akmar Mokhtar, Waleligne Molla Salilew, Zainal Ambri Abdul Karim, Aijaz Abbasi, Najeebullah Lashari, Syed Muslim Jameel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Afzal Ahmed SoomroDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-729X
Ainul Akmar MokhtarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.
Waleligne Molla SalilewDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.
Zainal Ambri Abdul KarimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3761-6645
Aijaz AbbasiMechanical Engineering Department, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering Science and Technology, Nawabshah 67450, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0210-6912
Najeebullah LashariDepartment of Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering & Technology, M.A. Jinnah Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Syed Muslim JameelSchool of Engineering, University of Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.

Funding

Universiti Teknologi Petronas YUTP-FRG, Cost Cen-610 tre 015LC0-347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the energy management of district cooling plants, the thermal energy storage tank is critical. As a result, it is essential to keep track of TES results. The performance of the TES has been measured using a variety of methodologies, both numerical and analytical. In this study, the performance of the TES tank in terms of thermocline thickness is predicted using an artificial neural network, support vector machine, and k-nearest neighbor, which has remained unexplored. One year of data was collected from a district cooling plant. Fourteen sensors were used to measure the temperature at different points. With engineering judgement, 263 rows of data were selected and used to develop the prediction models. A total of 70% of the data were used for training, whereas 30% were used for testing. K-fold cross-validation were used. Sensor temperature data was used as the model input, whereas thermocline thickness was used as the model output. The data were normalized, and in addition to this, moving average filter and median filter data smoothing techniques were applied while developing KNN and SVM prediction models to carry out a comparison. The hyperparameters for the three machine learning models were chosen at optimal condition, and the trial-and-error method was used to select the best hyperparameter value: based on this, the optimum architecture of ANN was 14-10-1, which gives the maximum R-Squared value, i.e., 0.9, and minimum mean square error. Finally, the prediction accuracy of three different techniques and results were compared, and the accuracy of ANN is 0.92%, SVM is 89%, and KNN is 96.3%, concluding that KNN has better performance than others.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerCluster AnalysisSupport Vector Machineartificial neural networksk-nearest neighbor district collingsupport vector machinetemperature distributiontemperature sensorsthermal energy storagethermocline thickness

Identifiers

PMID36236785
PMCPMC9573049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.