ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Study on the Classification of Metal Objects by a Fluxgate Magnetometer Cube Structure.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-target magnetic anomaly detection and recognition based on a board-level micro fully integrated fluxgate tensor for unexploded ordnance (UXO) mission.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After wars, some unexploded bombs remained underground, and these faulty bombs seriously threaten the safety of people. The ability to accurately identify targets is crucial for subsequent mining work. A deep learning algorithm is used to recognize targets, which significantly improves recognition accuracy compared with the traditional recognition algorithm for measuring the magnetic moment of the target and the included geomagnetism angle. In this paper, a ResNet-18-based recognition system is presented for classifying metallic object types. First, a fluxgate magnetometer cube arrangement structure (FMCAS) magnetic field feature collector is constructed, utilizing an eight-fluxgate magnetometer sensor array structure that provides a 400 mm separation between each sensitive unit. Magnetic field data are acquired, along an east-west survey line on the northern side of the measured target using the FMCAS. Next, the location and type of targets are modified to create a database of magnetic target models, increasing the diversity of the training dataset. The experimental dataset is constructed by constructing the magnetic flux density tensor matrix. Finally, the enhanced ResNet-18 is used to train the data for the classification recognition recognizer. According to the test findings of 107 validation set groups, this method's recognition accuracy is 84.1 percent. With a recognition accuracy rate of 96.3 percent, a recall rate of 96.4 percent, and a precision rate of 96.4 percent, the target with the largest magnetic moment has the best recognition impact. Experimental findings demonstrate that our enhanced RestNet-18 network can efficiently classify metallic items. This provides a new idea for underground metal target identification and classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.