ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Path Loss Measurements and Model Analysis in an Indoor Corridor Environment at 28 GHz and 38 GHz.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance analysis of improved path loss models for millimeter-wave wireless network channels at 28 GHz and 38 GHz.PloS one · 2023Article
- Hybrid computational and real data-based positioning of small cells in 5G networks.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines the large-scale path loss models for an indoor corridor environment at frequencies of 28 and 38 GHz. The measurement environment consists of an indoor corridor with both line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line of sight (NLOS) scenarios using vertical-vertical (V-V) and vertical-horizontal (V-H) antenna polarizations. The single-frequency close-in (CI), floating intercept (FI), free space large-scale path loss models and measured data from the measurement campaign were used to evaluate the performance analysis. The paper also focuses on various parameters, such as standard deviation, path loss exponent (PLE), accuracy, simplicity, and stability of the models. The analysis focuses on the peculiarity of the effect of the wall proximity on the path loss parameters as well as comparisons with the parameters in some of the reviewed literature studies. The FI and CI models produce comparable results for both antenna polarizations and clearly fit with the measured path loss. The PLE, with the highest value of 3.33 at 38 GHz (V-H), is much higher in the NLOS scenario with V-H polarization due to the signal degradation along the path from the transmitter (Tx) to the receiver (Rx). This is because there is no direct LOS between the Tx and Rx antennas. The Rx only relies on signal diffractions and reflections from obstacles as it transmits through the path from the Tx antenna. The path loss measurements and model analysis presented here are useful in designing 5G wireless communication systems for indoor environments, particularly for power budget calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.