ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Wearable Sensors for Learning Enhancement in Higher Education.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence for the Analysis of Biometric Data from Wearables in Education: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in Wearable Sensors for Learning Analytics: Trends, Challenges, and Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Wearable Biosensor Technology in Education: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Wearable sensors for respiratory protection in occupational settings.Journal of safety research · 2026Review
- Intelligent optimization of track and field teaching using machine learning and wearable sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 33 Unresolved Questions in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Technology Integration in Syrian Medical Education From the Perspective of Students and Faculty: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Active role of participants in neuroempowerment training and supportive neurotechnologies: a theoretical-methodological perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- A Highly Flexible Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Sensor for Wearable Bone Density Testing.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable sensors have traditionally been used to measure and monitor vital human signs for well-being and healthcare applications. However, there is a growing interest in using and deploying these technologies to facilitate teaching and learning, particularly in a higher education environment. The aim of this paper is therefore to systematically review the range of wearable devices that have been used for enhancing the teaching and delivery of engineering curricula in higher education. Moreover, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of these devices according to the location in which they are worn on the human body. According to our survey, wearable devices for enhanced learning have mainly been worn on the head (e.g., eyeglasses), wrist (e.g., watches) and chest (e.g., electrocardiogram patch). In fact, among those locations, head-worn devices enable better student engagement with the learning materials, improved student attention as well as higher spatial and visual awareness. We identify the research questions and discuss the research inclusion and exclusion criteria to present the challenges faced by researchers in implementing learning technologies for enhanced engineering education. Furthermore, we provide recommendations on using wearable devices to improve the teaching and learning of engineering courses in higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.