Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236721›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Residual-Inception U-Net (RIU-Net) Approach and Comparisons with U-Shaped CNN and Transformer Models for Building Segmentation from High-Resolution Satellite Images.

Batuhan Sariturk, Dursun Zafer Seker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Batuhan SariturkDepartment of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8777-4436
Dursun Zafer SekerDepartment of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7498-1540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building segmentation is crucial for applications extending from map production to urban planning. Nowadays, it is still a challenge due to CNNs' inability to model global context and Transformers' high memory need. In this study, 10 CNN and Transformer models were generated, and comparisons were realized. Alongside our proposed Residual-Inception U-Net (RIU-Net), U-Net, Residual U-Net, and Attention Residual U-Net, four CNN architectures (Inception, Inception-ResNet, Xception, and MobileNet) were implemented as encoders to U-Net-based models. Lastly, two Transformer-based approaches (Trans U-Net and Swin U-Net) were also used. Massachusetts Buildings Dataset and Inria Aerial Image Labeling Dataset were used for training and evaluation. On Inria dataset, RIU-Net achieved the highest IoU score, F1 score, and test accuracy, with 0.6736, 0.7868, and 92.23%, respectively. On Massachusetts Small dataset, Attention Residual U-Net achieved the highest IoU and F1 scores, with 0.6218 and 0.7606, and Trans U-Net reached the highest test accuracy, with 94.26%. On Massachusetts Large dataset, Residual U-Net accomplished the highest IoU and F1 scores, with 0.6165 and 0.7565, and Attention Residual U-Net attained the highest test accuracy, with 93.81%. The results showed that RIU-Net was significantly successful on Inria dataset. On Massachusetts datasets, Residual U-Net, Attention Residual U-Net, and Trans U-Net provided successful results.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerData Collectionbuilding segmentationCNNInceptionresidual connectionssatellite imagesTransformer

Identifiers

PMID36236721
PMCPMC9570988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.