ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Comparison of RetinaNet-Based Single-Target Cascading and Multi-Target Detection Models for Administrative Regions in Network Map Pictures.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a critical need for detection of administrative regions through network map pictures in map censorship tasks, which can be implemented by target detection technology. However, on map images there tend to be numerous administrative regions overlaying map annotations and symbols, thus making it difficult to accurately detect each region. Using a RetinaNet-based target detection model integrating ResNet50 and a feature pyramid network (FPN), this study built a multi-target model and a single-target cascading model from three single-target models by taking Taiwan, Tibet, and the Chinese mainland as target examples. Two models were evaluated both in classification and localization accuracy to investigate their administrative region detection performance. The results show that the single-target cascading model was able to detect more administrative regions, with a higher f1_score of 0.86 and mAP of 0.85 compared to the multi-target model (0.56 and 0.52, respectively). Furthermore, location box size distribution from the single-target cascading model looks more similar to that of manually annotated box sizes, which signifies that the proposed cascading model is superior to the multi-target model. This study is promising in providing support for computer map reading and intelligent map censorship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.