ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Can You Do That Again? Time Series Consolidation as a Robust Method of Tailoring Gesture Recognition to Individual Users.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Robust inter-session modeling of gestures is still an open learning challenge. A sleeve equipped with capacitive strap sensors was used to capture two gesture data sets from a convenience sample of eight subjects. Two pipelines were explored. In FILT a novel two-stage algorithm was introduced which uses an unsupervised learning algorithm to find samples representing gesture transitions and discards them prior to training and validating conventional models. In TSC a confusion matrix was used to automatically consolidate commonly confused class labels, resulting in a set of gestures tailored to an individual subject's abilities. The inter-session testing accuracy using the Time Series Consolidation (TSC) method increased from a baseline inter-session average of 42.47 ± 3.83% to 93.02% ± 4.97% while retaining an average of 5.29 ± 0.46 out of the 11 possible gesture categories. These pipelines used classic machine learning algorithms which require relatively small amounts of data and computational power compared to deep learning solutions. These methods may also offer more flexibility in interface design for users suffering from handicaps limiting their manual dexterity or ability to reliably make gestures, and be possible to implement on edge devices with low computational power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.