Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236483›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Review on Multiscale-Deep-Learning Applications.

Elizar Elizar, Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley, Rusdha Muharar, Mohd Hairi Mohd Zaman, Seri Mastura Mustaza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CAFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizar ElizarDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7926-2668
Mohd Asyraf ZulkifleyDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4010-3990
Rusdha MuhararDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Kopelma Darussalam 23111, Indonesia.
Mohd Hairi Mohd ZamanDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-4869
Seri Mastura MustazaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

RHB Bank RHB-UKM Endowment Fund (RHB-UKM-2021-001)Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Dana Padanan Kolaborasi (DPK-2021-012)Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia GGPM-2019-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In general, most of the existing convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep-learning models suffer from spatial-information loss and inadequate feature-representation issues. This is due to their inability to capture multiscale-context information and the exclusion of semantic information throughout the pooling operations. In the early layers of a CNN, the network encodes simple semantic representations, such as edges and corners, while, in the latter part of the CNN, the network encodes more complex semantic features, such as complex geometric shapes. Theoretically, it is better for a CNN to extract features from different levels of semantic representation because tasks such as classification and segmentation work better when both simple and complex feature maps are utilized. Hence, it is also crucial to embed multiscale capability throughout the network so that the various scales of the features can be optimally captured to represent the intended task. Multiscale representation enables the network to fuse low-level and high-level features from a restricted receptive field to enhance the deep-model performance. The main novelty of this review is the comprehensive novel taxonomy of multiscale-deep-learning methods, which includes details of several architectures and their strengths that have been implemented in the existing works. Predominantly, multiscale approaches in deep-learning networks can be classed into two categories: multiscale feature learning and multiscale feature fusion. Multiscale feature learning refers to the method of deriving feature maps by examining kernels over several sizes to collect a larger range of relevant features and predict the input images' spatial mapping. Multiscale feature fusion uses features with different resolutions to find patterns over short and long distances, without a deep network. Additionally, several examples of the techniques are also discussed according to their applications in satellite imagery, medical imaging, agriculture, and industrial and manufacturing systems.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerSemanticsartificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networkdeep learningmachine learningmultiscale featuresneural network

Identifiers

PMID36236483
PMCPMC9573412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.