Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236438›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Virtual Sensing Concept for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Monitoring Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Thulane Paepae, Pitshou N Bokoro, Kyandoghere Kyamakya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thulane PaepaeDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa.
Pitshou N BokoroDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9178-2700
Kyandoghere KyamakyaInstitute for Smart Systems Technologies, Transportation Informatics, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-9476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harmful cyanobacterial bloom (HCB) is problematic for drinking water treatment, and some of its strains can produce toxins that significantly affect human health. To better control eutrophication and HCB, catchment managers need to continuously keep track of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in the water bodies. However, the high-frequency monitoring of these water quality indicators is not economical. In these cases, machine learning techniques may serve as viable alternatives since they can learn directly from the available surrogate data. In the present work, a random forest, extremely randomized trees (ET), extreme gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, a light gradient boosting machine, and bagging regressor-based virtual sensors were used to predict N and P in two catchments with contrasting land uses. The effect of data scaling and missing value imputation were also assessed, while the Shapley additive explanations were used to rank feature importance. A specification book, sensitivity analysis, and best practices for developing virtual sensors are discussed. Results show that ET, MinMax scaler, and a multivariate imputer were the best predictive model, scaler, and imputer, respectively. The highest predictive performance, reported in terms of R

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaDrinking WaterHumansMachine LearningNitrogenPhosphorusDrinking WaterNitrogenPhosphorusaccuracy benchmarkbaseline modeldata scalingmachine learningmissing values handlingsoft-sensorspecification booksurrogate parameterswater quality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36236438
PMCPMC9572788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.