Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236430›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Objective Signal Analysis for Investigating Feasibility of Active Noise Cancellation in Hearing Screening.

Hsiu-Lien Cheng, Ji-Yan Han, Wei-Zhong Zheng, Yen-Fu Cheng, Yuan-Chia Chu, Chia-Mei Lin, Ming-Chang Chiang, Wen-Huei Liao, Ying-Hui Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Optimized Active Noise Cancellation for Hearing Tests Using Auditory Masking Characteristics.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hsiu-Lien ChengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2661-9923
Ji-Yan HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Wei-Zhong ZhengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Yen-Fu ChengDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
Yuan-Chia ChuInformation Management Office, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0997-5168
Chia-Mei LinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Ming-Chang ChiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-6032
Wen-Huei LiaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
Ying-Hui LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4120-7289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of active noise cancellation (ANC) technology, ANC has been used to mitigate the effects of environmental noise on audiometric results. However, objective evaluation methods supporting the accuracy of audiometry for ANC exposure to different levels of noise have not been reported. Accordingly, the audio characteristics of three different ANC headphone models were quantified under different noise conditions and the feasibility of ANC in noisy environments was investigated. Steady (pink noise) and non-steady noise (cafeteria babble noise) were used to simulate noisy environments. We compared the integrity of pure-tone signals obtained from three different ANC headphone models after processing under different noise scenarios and analyzed the degree of ANC signal correlation based on the Pearson correlation coefficient compared to pure-tone signals in quiet. The objective signal correlation results were compared with audiometric screening results to confirm the correspondence. Results revealed that ANC helped mitigate the effects of environmental noise on the measured signal and the combined ANC headset model retained the highest signal integrity. The degree of signal correlation was used as a confidence indicator for the accuracy of hearing screening in noise results. It was found that the ANC technique can be further improved for more complex noisy environments.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningNoiseAudiometry, Pure-ToneFeasibility StudiesHearingactive noise cancellationhearing screeningPearson correlation

Identifiers

PMID36236430
PMCPMC9572409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.