Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236402›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

COVID-19 Detection on Chest X-ray and CT Scan: A Review of the Top-100 Most Cited Papers.

Yandre M G Costa, Sergio A Silva, Lucas O Teixeira, Rodolfo M Pereira, Diego Bertolini, Alceu S Britto, Luiz S Oliveira, George D C Cavalcanti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 detection from exhaled breath.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yandre M G CostaDepartamento de Informática, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0630-3171
Sergio A SilvaDepartamento de Informática, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5270-370X
Lucas O TeixeiraDepartamento de Informática, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3615-1567
Rodolfo M PereiraInstituto Federal do Paraná, Pinhais 83330-200, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1272-5378
Diego BertoliniDepartamento Acadêmico de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campo Mourão 87301-899, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6196-4538
Alceu S BrittoDepartmento de Ciência da Computação, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3064-3563
Luiz S OliveiraDepartamento de Informática, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-5370
George D C CavalcantiCentro de Informática, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-560, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7714-2283

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.630259/2021-00National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 163458/2020-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, many works have been published proposing solutions to the problems that arose in this scenario. In this vein, one of the topics that attracted the most attention is the development of computer-based strategies to detect COVID-19 from thoracic medical imaging, such as chest X-ray (CXR) and computerized tomography scan (CT scan). By searching for works already published on this theme, we can easily find thousands of them. This is partly explained by the fact that the most severe worldwide pandemic emerged amid the technological advances recently achieved, and also considering the technical facilities to deal with the large amount of data produced in this context. Even though several of these works describe important advances, we cannot overlook the fact that others only use well-known methods and techniques without a more relevant and critical contribution. Hence, differentiating the works with the most relevant contributions is not a trivial task. The number of citations obtained by a paper is probably the most straightforward and intuitive way to verify its impact on the research community. Aiming to help researchers in this scenario, we present a review of the top-100 most cited papers in this field of investigation according to the Google Scholar search engine. We evaluate the distribution of the top-100 papers taking into account some important aspects, such as the type of medical imaging explored, learning settings, segmentation strategy, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and finally, the dataset and code availability.

Indexed as

COVID-19Artificial IntelligenceHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Rayschest X-rayCOVID-19CT scanmachine learningpattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID36236402
PMCPMC9570662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.