Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236381›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Feasibility of Brachial Occlusion Technique for Beat-to-Beat Pulse Wave Analysis.

Lukas Matera, Pavol Sajgalik, Vratislav Fabian, Yegor Mikhailov, David Zemanek, Bruce D Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas MateraDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 16627 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7120-9544
Pavol SajgalikDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Vratislav FabianDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 16627 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6390-0116
Yegor MikhailovDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 16627 Prague, Czech Republic.
David Zemanek2nd Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiology and Angiology of General University Hospital and 1st Medical Faculty of Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic.
Bruce D JohnsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Funding

Czech Technical University in Prague SGS19/166/OHK3/3T/13Czech Technical University in Prague SGS22/160/OHK3/3T/13Mayo Clinic HL71478Technology Agency of the Czech Republic TH04010173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Czech physiologist Penaz tried to overcome limitations of invasive pulse-contour methods (PCM) in clinical applications by a non-invasive method (finger mounted BP cuff) for continuous arterial waveform detection and beat-to-beat analysis. This discovery resulted in significant interest in human physiology and non-invasive examination of hemodynamic parameters, however has limitations because of the distal BP recording using a volume-clamp method. Thus, we propose a validation of beat-to-beat signal analysis acquired by novel a brachial occlusion-cuff (suprasystolic) principle and signal obtained from Finapres during a forced expiratory effort against an obstructed airway (Valsalva maneuver). Twelve healthy adult subjects [2 females, age = (27.2 ± 5.1) years] were in the upright siting position, breathe through the mouthpiece (simultaneously acquisition by brachial blood pressure monitor and Finapres) and at a defined time were asked to generate positive mouth pressure for 20 s (Valsalva). For the purpose of signal analysis, we proposed parameter a “Occlusion Cuff Index” (OCCI). The assumption about similarities between measured signals (suprasystolic brachial pulse waves amplitudes and Finapres’s MAP) were proved by averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r- = 0.60, p < 0.001). The averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the comparative analysis of OCCI between methods was r- = 0.88, p < 0.001. The average percent change of OCCI during maneuver: 8% increase, 19% decrease and percent change of max/min ratio is 35%. The investigation of brachial pulse waves measured by novel brachial blood pressure monitor shows positive correlation with Finapres and the parameter OCCI shows promise as an index, which could describe changes during beat-to-beat cardiac cycles.

Indexed as

Brachial ArteryPulse Wave AnalysisAdultBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFingersHeart RateHumansYoung Adultcuffnon-invasiveocclusionpulse wave

Identifiers

PMID36236381
PMCPMC9572570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.