Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236278›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Detecting Gait Events from Accelerations Using Reservoir Computing.

Laurent Chiasson-Poirier, Hananeh Younesian, Katia Turcot, Julien Sylvestre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurent Chiasson-PoirierInterdisciplinary Institute for Technological Innovation (3IT), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada.
Hananeh YounesianCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale (Cirris), Department of Kinesiology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7695-2417
Katia TurcotCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale (Cirris), Department of Kinesiology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2649-3459
Julien SylvestreInterdisciplinary Institute for Technological Innovation (3IT), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-7052

Funding

New Frontier NFRFE-2018-00598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmenting the gait cycle into multiple phases using gait event detection (GED) is a well-researched subject with many accurate algorithms. However, the algorithms that are able to perform accurate and robust GED for real-life environments and physical diseases tend to be too complex for their implementation on simple hardware systems limited in computing power and memory, such as those used in wearable devices. This study focuses on a numerical implementation of a reservoir computing (RC) algorithm called the echo state network (ESN) that is based on simple computational steps that are easy to implement on portable hardware systems for real-time detection. RC is a neural network method that is widely used for signal processing applications and uses a fast-training method based on a ridge regression adapted to the large quantity and variety of IMU data needed to use RC in various real-life environment GED. In this study, an ESN was used to perform offline GED with gait data from IMU and ground force sensors retrieved from three databases for a total of 28 healthy adults and 15 walking conditions. Our main finding is that despite its low complexity, ESN is robust for GED, with performance comparable to other state-of-the-art algorithms. Our results show the ESN is robust enough to obtain good detection results in all conditions if the algorithm is trained with variable data that match those conditions. The distribution of the mean absolute errors (MAE) between the detection times from the ESN and the force sensors were between 40 and 120 ms for 6 defined gait events (95th percentile). We compared our ESN with four different state-of-the-art algorithms from the literature. The ESN obtained a MAE not more than 10 ms above three other reference algorithms for normal walking indoor and outdoor conditions and yielded the 2nd lowest MAE and the 2nd highest true positive rate and specificity when applied to outdoor walking and running conditions. Our work opens the door to using the ESN as a GED for applications in wearable sensors for long-term patient monitoring.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAccelerationAdultAlgorithmsHumansSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedecho state networkgait event detectionIMU sensorsreservoir computing

Identifiers

PMID36236278
PMCPMC9570885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.