Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236200›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automatic Segmentation of Periodontal Tissue Ultrasound Images with Artificial Intelligence: A Novel Method for Improving Dataset Quality.

Radu Chifor, Mircea Hotoleanu, Tiberiu Marita, Tudor Arsenescu, Mihai Adrian Socaciu, Iulia Clara Badea, Ioana Chifor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Radu ChiforDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8262-2166
Mircea HotoleanuRomanian Institute of Science and Technology, 400022 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Tiberiu MaritaComputer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5987-9174
Tudor ArsenescuChifor Research SRL, 400068 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihai Adrian SocaciuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iulia Clara BadeaDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioana ChiforDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RORomanian Institute of Science and Technology · ROTechnical University of Cluj-Napoca · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate Mask R-CNN and U-Net convolutional neural network models for pixel-level classification in order to perform the automatic segmentation of bi-dimensional images of US dental arches, identifying anatomical elements required for periodontal diagnosis. A secondary aim was to evaluate the efficiency of a correction method of the ground truth masks segmented by an operator, for improving the quality of the datasets used for training the neural network models, by 3D ultrasound reconstructions of the examined periodontal tissue.

methodsUltrasound periodontal investigations were performed for 52 teeth of 11 patients using a 3D ultrasound scanner prototype. The original ultrasound images were segmented by a low experienced operator using region growing-based segmentation algorithms. Three-dimensional ultrasound reconstructions were used for the quality check and correction of the segmentation. Mask R-CNN and U-NET were trained and used for prediction of periodontal tissue's elements identification.

resultsThe average Intersection over Union ranged between 10% for the periodontal pocket and 75.6% for gingiva. Even though the original dataset contained 3417 images from 11 patients, and the corrected dataset only 2135 images from 5 patients, the prediction's accuracy is significantly better for the models trained with the corrected dataset.

conclusionsThe proposed quality check and correction method by evaluating in the 3D space the operator's ground truth segmentation had a positive impact on the quality of the datasets demonstrated through higher IoU after retraining the models using the corrected dataset.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUltrasonography3D ultrasound reconstructionsartificial intelligenceautomatic segmentationdataset qualityperiodontal tissue

Identifiers

PMID36236200
PMCPMC9572264
OpenAlexW4296743360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.