Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236142›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds for Food and Agricultural Applications.

Giovani Leone Zabot, Fabiele Schaefer Rodrigues, Lissara Polano Ody, Marcus Vinícius Tres, Esteban Herrera, Heidy Palacin, Javier S Córdova-Ramos, Ivan Best, Luis Olivera-Montenegro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Liposomal Formulation of Bioactive Substances fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giovani Leone ZabotLaboratory of Agroindustrial Processes Engineering (LAPE), Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Cachoeira do Sul 6508-010, Brazil.
Fabiele Schaefer RodriguesLaboratory of Agroindustrial Processes Engineering (LAPE), Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Cachoeira do Sul 6508-010, Brazil.
Lissara Polano OdyLaboratory of Agroindustrial Processes Engineering (LAPE), Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Cachoeira do Sul 6508-010, Brazil.
Marcus Vinícius TresLaboratory of Agroindustrial Processes Engineering (LAPE), Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Cachoeira do Sul 6508-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-0735
Esteban HerreraGrupo de Investigación en Bioprocesos y Conversión de la Biomasa, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.
Heidy PalacinGrupo de Investigación en Bioprocesos y Conversión de la Biomasa, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-2823-3538
Javier S Córdova-RamosGrupo de Investigación en Bioprocesos y Conversión de la Biomasa, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.
Ivan BestGrupo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación en Alimentos, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-6575
Luis Olivera-MontenegroGrupo de Investigación en Bioprocesos y Conversión de la Biomasa, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-0151-7031

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 308067/2021-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents an updated scenario of findings and evolutions of encapsulation of bioactive compounds for food and agricultural applications. Many polymers have been reported as encapsulated agents, such as sodium alginate, gum Arabic, chitosan, cellulose and carboxymethylcellulose, pectin, Shellac, xanthan gum, zein, pullulan, maltodextrin, whey protein, galactomannan, modified starch, polycaprolactone, and sodium caseinate. The main encapsulation methods investigated in the study include both physical and chemical ones, such as freeze-drying, spray-drying, extrusion, coacervation, complexation, and supercritical anti-solvent drying. Consequently, in the food area, bioactive peptides, vitamins, essential oils, caffeine, plant extracts, fatty acids, flavonoids, carotenoids, and terpenes are the main compounds encapsulated. In the agricultural area, essential oils, lipids, phytotoxins, medicines, vaccines, hemoglobin, and microbial metabolites are the main compounds encapsulated. Most scientific investigations have one or more objectives, such as to improve the stability of formulated systems, increase the release time, retain and protect active properties, reduce lipid oxidation, maintain organoleptic properties, and present bioactivities even in extreme thermal, radiation, and pH conditions. Considering the increasing worldwide interest for biomolecules in modern and sustainable agriculture, encapsulation can be efficient for the formulation of biofungicides, biopesticides, bioherbicides, and biofertilizers. With this review, it is inferred that the current scenario indicates evolutions in the production methods by increasing the scales and the techno-economic feasibilities. The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) for most of the encapsulation methods is going beyond TRL 6, in which the knowledge gathered allows for having a functional prototype or a representative model of the encapsulation technologies presented in this review.

Indexed as

bioactive compoundschitosancoating materialencapsulation efficiencygum Arabicpolymers

Identifiers

PMID36236142
PMCPMC9571964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.