Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236133›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Hydrogel: A Potential Material for Bone Tissue Engineering Repairing the Segmental Mandibular Defect.

D S Abdullah Al Maruf, Yohaann Ali Ghosh, Hai Xin, Kai Cheng, Payal Mukherjee, Jeremy Micah Crook, Gordon George Wallace, Travis Jacob Klein, Jonathan Robert Clark

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

D S Abdullah Al MarufIntegrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8573-4035
Yohaann Ali GhoshIntegrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Hai XinIntegrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6914-3910
Kai ChengRoyal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Payal MukherjeeIntegrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Jeremy Micah CrookBiomedical Innovation, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Gordon George WallaceARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0381-7273
Travis Jacob KleinCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove 4059, Australia.
Jonathan Robert ClarkIntegrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-772X
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free flap surgery is currently the only successful method used by surgeons to reconstruct critical-sized defects of the jaw, and is commonly used in patients who have had bony lesions excised due to oral cancer, trauma, infection or necrosis. However, donor site morbidity remains a significant flaw of this strategy. Various biomaterials have been under investigation in search of a suitable alternative for segmental mandibular defect reconstruction. Hydrogels are group of biomaterials that have shown their potential in various tissue engineering applications, including bone regeneration, both through in vitro and in vivo pre-clinical animal trials. This review discusses different types of hydrogels, their fabrication techniques, 3D printing, their potential for bone regeneration, outcomes, and the limitations of various hydrogels in preclinical models for bone tissue engineering. This review also proposes a modified technique utilizing the potential of hydrogels combined with scaffolds and cells for efficient reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects.

Indexed as

3D printingbone tissue engineeringhydrogelmandibular defectscaffolds

Identifiers

PMID36236133
PMCPMC9571534
OpenAlexW4303969093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.