Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236107›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Anatomically and Biomechanically Relevant Monolithic Total Disc Replacement Made of 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane.

Muhammad Hanif Nadhif, Muhammad Maulana Ghiffary, Muhammad Irsyad, Nuzli Fahdia Mazfufah, Fakhira Nurhaliza, Siti Fauziyah Rahman, Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim, Tri Kurniawati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Hanif NadhifMedical Physiology and Biophysics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-6880-2523
Muhammad Maulana GhiffaryMedical Technology Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4573-940X
Muhammad IrsyadMedical Technology Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.
Nuzli Fahdia MazfufahStem Cells and Tissue Engineering Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.
Fakhira NurhalizaMedical Technology Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.
Siti Fauziyah RahmanBiomedical Engineering Program, Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4696-3182
Ahmad Jabir RahyussalimStem Cells and Tissue Engineering Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3248-1147
Tri KurniawatiStem Cells and Tissue Engineering Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.
University of Indonesia · IDRumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo · ID

Funding

University of Indonesia NKB-563/UN.2.RST/HKP.05.00/2021University of Indonesia NKB-701/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various implant treatments, including total disc replacements, have been tried to treat lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration, which is claimed to be the main contributor of lower back pain. The treatments, however, come with peripheral issues. This study proposes a novel approach that complies with the anatomical features of IVD, the so-called monolithic total disc replacement (MTDR). As the name suggests, the MTDR is a one-part device that consists of lattice and rigid structures to mimic the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus, respectively. The MTDR can be made of two types of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU 87A and TPU 95A) and fabricated using a 3D printing approach: fused filament fabrication. The MTDR design involves two configurations-the full lattice (FLC) and anatomy-based (ABC) configurations. The MTDR is evaluated in terms of its physical, mechanical, and cytotoxicity properties. The physical characterization includes the geometrical evaluations, wettability measurements, degradability tests, and swelling tests. The mechanical characterization comprises compressive tests of the materials, an analytical approach using the Voigt model of composite, and a finite element analysis. The cytotoxicity assays include the direct assay using hemocytometry and the indirect assay using a tetrazolium-based colorimetric (MTS) assay. The geometrical evaluation shows that the fabrication results are tolerable, and the two materials have good wettability and low degradation rates. The mechanical characterization shows that the ABC-MTDR has more similar mechanical properties to an IVD than the FLC-MTDR. The cytotoxicity assays prove that the materials are non-cytotoxic, allowing cells to grow on the surfaces of the materials.

Indexed as

3D printingIVDMTDRTPU

Identifiers

PMID36236107
PMCPMC9571194
OpenAlexW4303980839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.