Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36236069›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam.

Lance M Graul, Staci J Horn, Landon D Nash, Thomas B Cheung, Fred J Clubb, Duncan J Maitland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lance M GraulDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8707-3100
Staci J HornDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Landon D NashShape Memory Medical Inc., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA.
Thomas B CheungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Fred J ClubbDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Duncan J MaitlandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7001-3761
Texas A&M University · USShape Memory Medical (United States) · US

Funding

Shape Memory Polymer Devices for Treating StrokeR01EB000462 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRNC LVRMR NAT LAB · PI MAITLAND, DUNCAN J · 2002 to 2012
$12.5M
Shape Memory Polymer Embolic Foams for Treating Cerebrovascular AneurysmsU01NS089692 · NINDS · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI MAITLAND, DUNCAN J · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
Shape Memory Polymer Vascular Occlusion Device for the Treatment of Venous Insufficiency Phase IIR44EB022016 · NIBIB · SHAPE MEMORY MEDICAL INC. · PI LANDSMAN, TODD · 2016 to 2017
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB000462NIBIB NIH HHS R44EB022016NINDS NIH HHS U01-NS089692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shape-memory polymer (SMP) polyurethane foams have been applied as embolic devices and implanted in multiple animal models. These materials are oxidatively degradable and it is critical to quantify and characterize the degradation for biocompatibility assessments. An image-based method using high-resolution and magnification scans of histology sections was used to estimate the mass loss of the peripheral and neurovascular embolization devices (PED, NED). Detailed analysis of foam microarchitecture (i.e., struts and membranes) was used to estimate total relative mass loss over time. PED foams implanted in porcine arteries showed a degradation rate of ~0.11% per day as evaluated at 30-, 60-, and 90-day explant timepoints. NED foams implanted in rabbit carotid elastase aneurysms showed a markedly faster rate of degradation at ~1.01% per day, with a clear difference in overall degradation between 30- and 90-day explants. Overall, membranes degraded faster than the struts. NEDs use more hydrophobic foam with a smaller pore size (~150-400 μm) compared to PED foams (~800-1200 μm). Previous in vitro studies indicated differences in the degradation of the two polymer systems, but not to the magnitude seen in vivo. Implant location, animal species, and local tissue health are among the hypothesized reasons for different degradation rates.

Indexed as

embolic deviceshistopathologyin vivo degradationpolymeric mass-loss estimationpolyurethane foamsshape-memory polymers

Identifiers

PMID36236069
PMCPMC9571375
OpenAlexW4303980815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.